Home
>
Knowledge
>
Algebra (all content)
>
Proofs concerning irrational numbers

Proofs concerning irrational numbers

"Proofs concerning irrational numbers" generally refer to mathematical arguments that demonstrate the irrationality of certain numbers, meaning that they cannot be expressed as a fraction of two integers. Key concepts often include:

  1. Direct Proofs: Demonstrating a number is irrational by showing that assuming it is rational leads to a contradiction. For example, the classic proof that √2 is irrational involves supposing √2 can be expressed as a fraction in simplest form and then deriving a contradiction based on properties of even and odd integers.

  2. Contradiction: This method often involves assuming the opposite of what one aims to prove and showing that this assumption leads to an impossible situation.

  3. Transcendental vs. Algebraic Irrationality: While many proofs focus on algebraic irrational numbers (like √2 or √3), transcendental numbers (like π and e) are shown to be irrational in more complex ways, often involving deep results from calculus and analysis.

  4. Rational Approximations: The concept of how rational numbers can approximate irrational numbers, often leading to insights about their properties.

  5. Density of Rational Numbers: Rational numbers are dense in the real numbers, which serves as a foundation for understanding how irrational numbers fit within the number system.

Overall, these proofs highlight the structure of the number system and help clarify the distinction between rational and irrational numbers.

Part 1: Proof: √2 is irrational

Sal proves that the square root of 2 is an irrational number, i.e. it cannot be given as the ratio of two integers.

Here are the key points to understand when studying the proof that √2 is irrational:

  1. Definition of Rational Numbers: A rational number can be expressed as a fraction pq\frac{p}{q} where pp and qq are integers, and q0q \neq 0.

  2. Assumption: Start by assuming that √2 is rational, so it can be expressed as pq\frac{p}{q}, with pp and qq in their simplest form (no common factors).

  3. Equation Setup: From the assumption, you derive the equation 2=pq\sqrt{2} = \frac{p}{q} and square both sides to get 2=p2q22 = \frac{p^2}{q^2}, leading to p2=2q2p^2 = 2q^2.

  4. Even Numbers: Since p2=2q2p^2 = 2q^2, it follows that p2p^2 is even, which implies that pp must also be even (the square of an odd number is odd).

  5. Substitution: If pp is even, it can be expressed as p=2kp = 2k for some integer kk. Substitute back into the equation to get (2k)2=2q2(2k)^2 = 2q^2, simplifying to 4k2=2q24k^2 = 2q^2 or q2=2k2q^2 = 2k^2.

  6. Contradiction: The conclusion q2=2k2q^2 = 2k^2 indicates that q2q^2 is also even, hence qq must also be even. This means both pp and qq are even, contradicting the assumption that pq\frac{p}{q} is in simplest form.

  7. Conclusion: Since the assumption that √2 is rational leads to a contradiction, it follows that √2 must be irrational.

These points outline the classic proof by contradiction used to demonstrate the irrationality of √2.

Part 2: Proof: square roots of prime numbers are irrational

Sal proves that the square root of any prime number must be an irrational number. For example, because of this proof we can quickly determine that √3, √5, √7, or √11 are irrational numbers.

Here are the key points for studying the proof that the square roots of prime numbers are irrational:

  1. Definition of Irrational Numbers: Understand that an irrational number cannot be expressed as a fraction of two integers.

  2. Proof by Contradiction: Familiarize yourself with the method of proof by contradiction, which involves assuming the opposite of what you want to prove and showing that this leads to a contradiction.

  3. Assumption: Start by assuming that the square root of a prime number pp is rational, meaning it can be expressed as ab\frac{a}{b}, where aa and bb are integers with no common factors (in simplest form).

  4. Squaring Both Sides: Square both sides of the equation to derive p=a2b2p = \frac{a^2}{b^2} or a2=pb2a^2 = pb^2.

  5. Divisibility: Analyze the implications of a2=pb2a^2 = pb^2. It shows that a2a^2 is divisible by pp, and thus aa must also be divisible by pp (because if a prime divides a square, it divides the base).

  6. Substituting Back: Let a=pka = pk for some integer kk, and substitute back into the equation to show that bb must also be divisible by pp.

  7. Contradiction: This leads to a contradiction because it implies that both aa and bb have pp as a common factor, which contradicts the original assumption of being in simplest form.

  8. Conclusion: Thus, the assumption that p\sqrt{p} is rational leads to a contradiction, proving that p\sqrt{p} is irrational.

By focusing on these points, you can effectively grasp the essentials of the proof that the square roots of prime numbers are irrational.

Part 3: Proof: there's an irrational number between any two rational numbers

Sal proves that when given any two rational numbers, no matter how close, we can find an irrational number that lies between them.

When studying the proof that there is an irrational number between any two rational numbers, focus on these key points:

  1. Understanding Rational Numbers: Rational numbers are numbers that can be expressed as the quotient of two integers (e.g., ab\frac{a}{b}, where aa and bb are integers, and b0b \neq 0).

  2. Irrational Numbers: These are numbers that cannot be expressed as a fraction of two integers, such as 2\sqrt{2} or π\pi.

  3. Choosing Rational Numbers: Let two rational numbers r1r_1 and r2r_2 such that r1<r2r_1 < r_2.

  4. Constructing the Interval: The goal is to find an irrational number xx such that r1<x<r2r_1 < x < r_2.

  5. Using an Irrational Offset: A common approach is to consider an irrational number (like 2\sqrt{2}) and adjust it so that it lies between r1r_1 and r2r_2. For example, using x=r1+(r2r1)22x = r_1 + (r_2 - r_1) \cdot \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}.

  6. Verifying the Boundedness: Show that the constructed number xx remains between r1r_1 and r2r_2.

  7. Generalization: This method can be generalized for any pair of rational numbers, illustrating that there are infinitely many irrational numbers between any two rationals.

Understanding these aspects provides a solid foundation for comprehending the nature of rational and irrational numbers and the idea that the set of irrational numbers is dense within the rational numbers.